How Funding Partnerships Work
The funder co-counsels with your firm through their funder-owned law firm, finances your case acquisition, and shares the fees. Usually 50/50.
Pros & Cons
An honest look at both sides. So you can make the best decision for your firm.
The pros and cons above are illustrative and not exhaustive. Every funding structure carries firm-specific legal, tax, and financial considerations. Always consult your CPA and an attorney before entering into any funding arrangement.
How Funding Partnerships Work
A funding partnership is a fundamentally different growth structure. Instead of borrowing money to fund your marketing, your firm co-counsels with a funder through the funder's own law firm. The funder finances your case acquisition, marketing spend, intake, sign-up campaigns, and in exchange the two firms share fees on the resulting cases, typically 50/50. There's no interest, no debt, and no repayment if cases don't resolve. This structure is built for one thing: scaling case acquisition. And that's exactly why the qualification bar is high. Funders back proven operators, not experiments. To qualify, your firm needs strong historicals of settling cases, consistent settlement averages in terms of time, and a deep command of your marketing metrics. You should know your cost per acquisition down to the dollar, because that number is what the funder is underwriting. When a firm can show that a dollar of marketing reliably becomes a signed case that settles on a predictable timeline, funders will finance that machine at serious scale.
What to Know Before You Apply
Do You Actually Qualify?
This structure is for firms with strong settlement historicals, consistent settlement timelines, and precise command of their marketing metrics. If you don't know your cost per acquisition, you're not ready for this product yet. We can help you get there.
50/50 vs. Cost of Debt
Half your fees is a real price. For firms with access to reasonably priced debt and the cash flow to service it, borrowing for marketing may cost less. Model both structures against your actual settlement values before choosing.
Control and Case Management
Ensure the agreement preserves your firm's complete control over litigation strategy and settlement decisions. The funder finances acquisition and shares fees. They don't practice your cases for you.
Limited Provider Pool
Only a subset of funders run this model, and each has their own vertical preferences and deal sizes. Working with a matchmaker who knows which funders do these deals, and on what terms, matters more here than anywhere else.